Back to the overview Article from | Shipbuilding & offshore industry
Ingenieur mit Schutzhelm betrachtet Baupläne vor Schiffen im Hafen, Symbol für Rohrfertigung und alternative Produktionsprozesse im Schiffbau wie Rohrbiegen statt Schweißen.

Tube bending instead of welding in shipbuilding – cost and labour in focus

Cost pressure meets skilled labour shortages

Shipbuilding is facing increasing cost pressure while simultaneously struggling with a shortage of qualified personnel. Skilled welders, in particular, are becoming harder to recruit and retain. This structural challenge is unlikely to ease in the near future.

As a result, manufacturing processes that rely heavily on manual welding are increasingly difficult to scale and control economically.

Welding as a labour‑intensive process

Welded pipe systems require numerous manual steps. Pipes must be cut, aligned, welded, finished and inspected. Each additional welded joint increases labour input, inspection effort and documentation requirements.

In an environment where skilled welding personnel are scarce, this dependency becomes a significant cost driver. Delays, rework and external inspections directly affect project budgets and delivery schedules.

Tube bending changes the cost structure

CNC‑based tube bending follows a fundamentally different approach. Instead of joining multiple segments, the required geometry is formed in a continuous bending process. Material continuity is preserved, while the number of welds is significantly reduced or eliminated entirely.

This not only shortens production time, but also reduces indirect costs related to quality checks, rework and logistics for fittings and welding consumables.

Reducing dependency on scarce labour

A key benefit of tube bending lies in the shift of qualification requirements. Welding remains highly dependent on individual skill and experience. Tube bending, by contrast, can be standardised and automated to a much greater extent.

Typical cost drivers of welded pipe systems include:

  • high reliance on qualified welding personnel
  • extensive inspection and documentation effort
  • additional materials such as fittings and welding consumables
  • rework caused by tolerances and alignment issues

Tube bending directly addresses these factors and increases resilience in production planning.

Heavy‑duty bending technology as an economic prerequisite

In shipbuilding, standard solutions are often insufficient. Large diameters, thick‑walled pipes and demanding materials require machines capable of handling high forces with consistent accuracy. Only heavy‑duty tube bending machines can deliver the economic benefits of bending under real production conditions.

The investment pays off not through individual components, but through lower labour costs, stable processes and reduced risk over the entire project lifecycle.

Conclusion: economic stability through decoupling

Tube bending does not replace welding in shipbuilding entirely. It replaces welding where cost, labour intensity and risk are highest. Heavy‑duty tube bending machines help to decouple production performance from the availability of scarce skilled labour.

In an industry facing long‑term labour shortages, this decoupling becomes a decisive economic advantage.

Back to the overview

This might also interest you